🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.